Steve wrote: I had heard that Lurchers may cost more to insure becuase they are classed as a working dogs. Is this true? (Fiona - before you ask - no - we ain't having a third one!)
Not even a tiny lickle one to snuggle into my neck of a cold wintry night.....?
I am a qualified Pet Plan Insurance Advisor (ha ha! What a joke, all I did was answer a PetPlan multiple choice thing at work and I got a certificate and badge etc) Anyway, I only know the Petplan forms, but if you tick pedigree and write a breed in the box the insurance costs more per month and with certain breeds that have knackered hips etc and other hereditary problems it costs even more. I have a lurcher and it costs me less than if I had a pure greyhound purley because I ticked crossbreed and not pedigree. Jane
__________________
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give."
I have been shopping around recently to change my insurance and near enough every form asks if your dog is used for working, security puropses etc. I have found, however.that its much dearer to insure Angus cos hes a greyhound. And for peoples information, so far tesco is the cheapest but not finished yet.....